G-Shocks vs Smartwatches

G-shock watch

G-Shocks vs Smartwatches and why comparing them is a mistake

First off, I think you have to be at least a Millennial to have experienced a G-Shock the proper way. I doubt Generation Z members are avid wearers of G-Shocks, although of course there might be some geeky exceptions. First introduced in 1983, the G-Shock market rapidly expanded in one of the biggest watch niches in the world. While some may consider that G-Shocks are obsolete now that smartwatches are the new gangster in town, I do not agree and I put up a list of arguments and reasons why G-Shocks are a completely different niche that cannot be affected by the success of smartwatches.

  1. G-Shocks are tough, smartwatches aren’t

I have yet to see a person going on survival trips in the woods to carry a smartwatch. They are not as tough as G-Shocks and the risks of breaking them are so big that it’s just not worth carrying one. As long as there is no developed tough outdoors smartwatch market, G-Shocks are irreplaceable in this regard.

  1. There is a huge variety of G-Shocks available

Since the first G-Shock in 1983, Casio created an incredible number of different G-Shock lines for every imaginable outdoor branch. Check this article for example where you can find tons of different G-Shocks: http://atomic811.com/best-g-shock-watch/. Smartwatches, on the other hand, are not as prevalent outside their tech bubble.

  1. Battery life is not an issue on G-Shocks

In terms of battery life, G-Shocks win by a landslide in every situation. Simply comparing the one-day battery life of a smartwatch to the self-solar charging battery lasting years of a G-Shock is not worth it. The G-Shock wins every time.

  1. You can find excellent affordable G-Shocks

I had some cheap smartwatches in the past thinking that they should not be so different from the expensive ones like Apple. God, I was so wrong. Cheap no-name smartwatches are a nightmare to cope with, the battery is draining like a broken pipe, the touchscreen is 50% of the time not understanding the command and so on. On the other hand, you can find a decent $50 G-Shock that has good build quality, works as intended, lasts for years and can be abused without breaking.

The bottom line here is that cheap smartwatches are terrible whereas G-Shocks are decent.

  1. Information about G-Shocks is plenty and everywhere

Sites like http://atomic811.com/ offer tons of useful information on dozens of different G-Shock models thus helping you make a much better decision whenever you’re in the market after a quality watch. The information on smartwatches, however, is much thinner and you often have to guide yourself by brand, price and this sort of stuff.

Overall I think I made my point. You might still consider that G-Shocks are not for you and go for a smartwatch instead, and that is completely fine since I never said that G-Shocks are in every matter better than smartwatches. All I did was debunk some myths and misunderstandings that seem to flood watch blogs nowadays. G-Shocks and smartwatches are two completely different watch niches that in my opinion cannot and do not have to be compared since they serve completely different purposes and needs.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
Email
Print